Chemistry / Electrochemical Cell Thermodynamics
FREE TO EXPLORE
LABORATORY 36 · NATURAL SCIENCES

Electrochemical Cell Thermodynamics lab report

A worked electrochemical cell thermodynamics lab report with gravimetric data tables, linear regression graphs, calculations, uncertainty and conclusions.

WORKED EXAMPLE · QUANTITATIVE OBSERVATIONS

A complete example laboratory report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report illustrates formal analytical gravimetry, volumetric calibrations, and linear regression analysis. Replace its observations with your own experimental telemetry when preparing a practical submission.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

Thermodynamics of Reversible Electrochemical Cells and the Temperature Coefficient of EMF. Determine the standard electromotive force (EMF), temperature coefficient (dE/dT), standard Gibbs free energy (ΔG°), standard entropy change (ΔS°), and standard enthalpy of reaction (ΔH°) for the reversible Daniell cell across the temperature range 288.15 K to 313.15 K.

2. Abstract

The thermodynamic functions of the reversible Daniell cell, Zn(s) | 1.000 M ZnSO₄(aq) || 1.000 M CuSO₄(aq) | Cu(s), were investigated across the temperature range 288.15 K to 313.15 K (15.0 °C to 40.0 °C) under open-circuit conditions using an ultra-high-impedance digital electrometer (Z_in > 10¹² Ω). A double-junction agar-gel salt bridge containing 3.0 M KCl was employed to suppress liquid junction potentials below 0.2 mV while maintaining electrolytic continuity between the half-cells. Reversible cell electromotive force (EMF) decreased strictly linearly from 1101.13 mV at 288.15 K to 1098.35 mV at 313.15 K. Ordinary least-squares linear regression of EMF against absolute temperature T yielded a temperature coefficient dE/dT = -0.11126 mV·K⁻¹ (-1.1126e-04 V·K⁻¹) and standard potential E°(298.15 K) = 1100.02 mV (1.10002 V) with an exceptional coefficient of determination R² = 0.99999. Application of the fundamental Gibbs-Helmholtz relations extracted standard Gibbs free energy ΔG°(298.15 K) = -212.27 ± 0.08 kJ·mol⁻¹, standard reaction entropy ΔS° = -21.47 ± 0.03 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹, and standard reaction enthalpy ΔH° = -218.67 ± 0.10 kJ·mol⁻¹. The empirical results match the authoritative NIST benchmark values (-212.27 kJ·mol⁻¹ and -218.67 kJ·mol⁻¹) with a percentage difference of only 6.9848e-04%, corroborating the negative entropy of reaction arising from the differential electrostrictive hydration of zinc and copper cations.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

Electrochemical cells provide an exceptionally direct, elegant, and non-destructive window into chemical thermodynamics. When a galvanic cell operates under reversible open-circuit conditions—measured using an electrometer with virtually infinite input impedance so that no net current flows—the electrical work performed is equal to the decrease in Gibbs free energy: ΔG = -nFE. Furthermore, according to fundamental thermodynamic state equations, the temperature coefficient of the electromotive force (dE/dT) is directly proportional to the standard reaction entropy change: ΔS = nF(dE/dT). By measuring the cell potential of the classic reversible Daniell cell across a controlled temperature envelope (288.15 K to 313.15 K), all key thermodynamic functions—ΔG°, ΔS°, and the reaction enthalpy ΔH°—are simultaneously and rigorously determined without recourse to calorimetry.

E(T) = \left(\frac{\partial E}{\partial T}\right) T + b \implies E = -0.1113 \cdot T + 1133.2 \implies \Delta G^\circ = -212.27\text{ kJ}\cdot\text{mol}^{-1}

The primary analytical visualization presents the equilibrium cell electromotive force E (in mV) as a function of absolute temperature T (in Kelvin). A linear Cartesian coordinate system is selected based directly on the thermodynamic temperature expansion of cell potential: E(T) = E°₂₉₈ + (∂E/∂T)·(T - 298.15). Over the 25 K temperature interval investigated, the heat capacity change of the reaction (ΔC_p) is negligible, rendering the entropy change ΔS° and the temperature coefficient dE/dT effectively constant. Multi-point linear least-squares regression across all six experimental points confirms near-perfect linearity (R² = 0.99999), enabling direct, highly robust extraction of the slope dE/dT without higher-order polynomial curvature. The regression Y-intercept b = 1133.19 mV represents the hypothetical extrapolated EMF at absolute zero (b = -ΔH° / nF), confirming the complete consistency of the Gibbs-Helmholtz model.

5. Method

  1. Burnish the zinc rod and copper plate with fine silicon carbide abrasive paper to expose clean, active metal surfaces. Degrease with acetone, rinse thoroughly with triple-distilled water, and immerse in 0.1 M nitric acid for 10 seconds before final rinsing.
  2. Transfer 100.0 mL of standardized 1.000 M ZnSO₄ into the left half-cell vessel and 100.0 mL of standardized 1.000 M CuSO₄ into the right vessel. Mount both vessels securely in the thermostatic water bath.
  3. Seat the freshly conditioned 3.0 M KCl agar salt bridge so that both porous sintered glass ends are fully submerged below the electrolyte surfaces, establishing ionic contact without convective bulk mixing.
  4. Connect the zinc anode to the negative electrometer terminal and the copper cathode to the positive terminal using gold-plated, shielded low-noise coaxial cables to eliminate contact potentials.
  5. Set the thermostatic circulator sequentially to 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, 30.0, 35.0, and 40.0 °C. Allow 15 minutes of equilibration at each coordinate until the Pt100 RTD reading and cell EMF stabilize within ±0.01 mV.
  6. Record the stable open-circuit cell EMF at each temperature. Plot E against absolute temperature T in Kelvin, perform linear least-squares regression to extract dE/dT, and calculate ΔG°, ΔS°, and ΔH° using fundamental thermodynamic relations.

6. Observations and calculation table

All gravimetric observations were recorded using a calibrated 4-decimal electronic analytical balance enclosed within a draft shield chamber. Volumetric aliquots were dispensed from a Class A burette. Residuals are computed relative to the ordinary least-squares regression line.

Table 1. Seven simulated gravimetric observations; x and y represent dispensed volume and net mass metrics.
No.Cell Operating Temperature T (°C)Equilibrium Reversible EMF E (mV)Absolute Temperature T (K)Cell Electromotive Force E (mV)Fitted y (g)Residual (g)
115.01101.1300288.15001101.13001101.1324-0.0024
220.01100.5800293.15001100.58001100.57610.0039
325.01100.0200298.15001100.02001100.01980.0002
430.01099.4600303.15001099.46001099.4635-0.0035
535.01098.9100308.15001098.91001098.90720.0028
640.01098.3500313.15001098.35001098.3510-0.0010

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

1. Raw Experimental Observables & Operating Coordinates: Cell thermostatic temperature t = 15.0 °C; Absolute temperature T = 288.15 K. Measured reversible equilibrium open-circuit EMF E = 1101.13 mV = 1.10113 V. Measurement conditions: Zero current (electrometer input impedance Z_in > 10¹² Ω). 2. Single-Point Apparent Gibbs Free Energy of Reaction: Electrochemical stoichiometry: Zn(s) + Cu²⁺(aq) ⇌ Zn²⁺(aq) + Cu(s) (n = 2 electrons). Faraday constant: F = 96,485.3 C·mol⁻¹. Single-point free energy: ΔG(T) = -n · F · E = -(2)(96485.3 C·mol⁻¹)(1.10113 V) = -212.49 kJ·mol⁻¹. 3. Multi-Point Ordinary Least-Squares Linear Regression Across T Coordinates: Linearized thermodynamic equation: E(T) = (∂E/∂T)·T + b. Regression slope (temperature coefficient): m = dE/dT = -0.11126 mV·K⁻¹ = -1.1126e-04 V·K⁻¹. Regression Y-intercept: b = 1133.19 mV. Coefficient of determination: R² = 0.99999. 4. Standard Thermodynamic State Functions Evaluated at 298.15 K (25.00 °C): Fitted Standard Potential: E°₂₉₈ = m·(298.15) + b = 1100.02 mV = 1.10002 V. Standard Gibbs Free Energy: ΔG° = -n · F · E°₂₉₈ = -(2)(96485.3)(1.10002) = -212.27 kJ·mol⁻¹. Standard Reaction Entropy: ΔS° = n · F · (dE/dT) = (2)(96485.3)(-1.1126e-04) = -21.47 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹. Standard Reaction Enthalpy: ΔH° = ΔG° + T·ΔS° = -212.27 + (298.15)(-0.02147) = -218.67 kJ·mol⁻¹. Reversible Thermal Heat: q_rev = T·ΔS° = (298.15)(-0.02147) = -6.40 kJ·mol⁻¹. Thermodynamic Efficiency: η_rev = ΔG° / ΔH° = 97.07% of chemical enthalpy converts to electrical work.

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

1097.9285.11098.8292.91099.7300.61100.6308.41101.5316.1Absolute Temperature T (K)Cell Electromotive Force E (mV)V = 15.0 mL, m = 1101.13 gV = 20.0 mL, m = 1100.58 gV = 25.0 mL, m = 1100.02 gV = 30.0 mL, m = 1099.46 gV = 35.0 mL, m = 1098.91 gV = 40.0 mL, m = 1098.35 g

Circular markers represent empirical gravimetric observations. The solid line represents the ordinary least-squares linear regression fit.

x̄ = 300.6500 mL; ȳ = 1099.7417 g
Σ(x − x̄)² = 437.5000 mL²
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = -48.6750 g·mL
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = -0.11125714 g/mL
b = ȳ − mx̄ = 1133.19112667 g
Gibbs-Helmholtz Linear Fit: E(T) = -0.11126·T + 1133.19 mV; dE/dT = -0.11126 mV·K⁻¹; ΔG°(298K) = -212.27 kJ·mol⁻¹; ΔS° = -21.47 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹; ΔH° = -218.67 kJ·mol⁻¹

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − theoretical value| / |theoretical value| × 100 = -0.0007%.

For n = 7 gravimetric observations, Σresidual² = 4.1905e-05; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 1.5474e-04. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 0.04654.

Propagating the fit parameters yields an experimental density standard error of 0.00890 kJ·mol⁻¹, with an ideal coefficient of determination R² = 0.999992.

In the high-precision determination of electrochemical cell thermodynamics and the temperature coefficient of EMF, metrological uncertainties and physical electroanalytical boundary conditions are rigorously quantified across thermostatic, electrometric, liquid junction, and chemical activity domains: (1) Microprocessor Thermostatic Water Bath & RTD Metrology: Temperature is maintained across both half-cell vessels within a circulating water bath controlled by a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) solid-state thermostat. Thermal stability over 30 minutes is certified to ±0.02 °C. Solution temperatures are measured with a calibrated four-wire platinum resistance thermometer (Pt100 RTD) traceable to the International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90) with an absolute uncertainty u(T) = 0.015 K. (2) High-Input-Impedance Digital Electrometer: Cell potentials are recorded using an advanced microprocessor-controlled electrometer featuring an input impedance Z_in > 10¹² Ω. This restricts circuit current draw to under 1.1 pA, ensuring that ohmic internal IR drops (i·R_cell < 0.0005 μV across a 400 Ω cell) and charge-transfer electrode polarization are strictly negligible. The instrument provides a digital resolution of 0.01 mV with an expanded calibration uncertainty of ±0.010 mV. (3) Liquid Junction Potential Suppression: The 3.0 M KCl in 3.0% agar-agar gel salt bridge maintains electroneutrality between the zinc and copper sulfate compartments. Because K⁺ and Cl⁻ ions have nearly identical mobilities (u(K⁺) = 7.62 × 10⁻⁴, u(Cl⁻) = 7.91 × 10⁻⁴ cm²·s⁻¹·V⁻¹), the liquid junction potential is suppressed below 0.5 mV. Over the 15 °C to 40 °C test window, the differential temperature drift in junction potential contributes an estimated standard uncertainty u(E_j) = 0.025 mV. (4) Multi-Point Least-Squares Regression & Covariance Propagation: The temperature coefficient m = dE/dT = -0.11126 mV·K⁻¹ is extracted from six discrete temperature coordinates (288.15 K to 313.15 K). The standard error of the slope is s_m = 0.00015 mV·K⁻¹ (relative error 0.13%), yielding a coefficient of determination R² = 0.99999. Propagating slope and intercept uncertainties through the thermodynamic equations u(ΔG°) = n F u(E°), u(ΔS°) = n F u(m), and u(ΔH°) = √[ u(ΔG°)² + (T u(ΔS°))² ] yields combined standard uncertainties: u(ΔG°) = 0.04 kJ·mol⁻¹, u(ΔS°) = 0.03 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹, and u(ΔH°) = 0.05 kJ·mol⁻¹. At the 95% confidence level (coverage factor k = 2), the expanded uncertainties are U(ΔG°) = ±0.08 kJ·mol⁻¹ (0.04%) and U(ΔH°) = ±0.10 kJ·mol⁻¹ (0.05%), confirming sub-0.1% experimental agreement with accepted NIST Standard Reference values.

10. Result and discussion

-212.27 = -212.27 kJ·mol⁻¹
CIPM standard reference value: -212.27 kJ·mol⁻¹

The quantitative results demonstrate the remarkable fidelity with which reversible electrochemical cells access fundamental thermodynamic state functions. The standard cell potential at 298.15 K was determined as E° = 1100.02 mV = 1.10002 V, in exact concordance with the theoretical difference between the standard reduction potentials of the two half-reactions: E°(Cu²⁺/Cu) = +0.337 V and E°(Zn²⁺/Zn) = -0.763 V. This yields a large negative standard Gibbs free energy change ΔG° = -212.27 kJ·mol⁻¹, corresponding to a massive thermodynamic equilibrium constant K = exp(-ΔG°/RT) = 1.54 × 10³⁷. The displacement of aqueous copper ions by metallic zinc is thus completely irreversible in practice. The negative temperature coefficient dE/dT = -0.11126 mV·K⁻¹ reflects a fundamental microscopic structural feature of aqueous electrolyte solutions. According to the second law of thermodynamics, ΔS° = nF(dE/dT) = -21.47 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹. The negative entropy change indicates that the products (Zn²⁺(aq) + Cu(s)) possess greater microscopic ordering than the reactants (Zn(s) + Cu²⁺(aq)). Both zinc and copper are divalent transition metal cations; however, the ionic radius of Zn²⁺ (r = 74 pm) gives rise to a more compact, strongly oriented primary hydration shell of six coordinated water molecules than that of the Jahn-Teller distorted Cu²⁺ ion (r = 73 pm in equatorial plane, but elongated axially). This increased solvent electrostriction immobilizes additional water molecules, producing a net reduction in solvent translational and rotational degrees of freedom. The standard reaction enthalpy ΔH° = -218.67 kJ·mol⁻¹ demonstrates that the reaction is strongly exothermic. Comparing the enthalpy and free energy reveals the Gibbs-Helmholtz energy partition: of the 218.67 kJ of total chemical bond energy liberated per mole of zinc consumed, 212.27 kJ (97.07%) is available as reversible electrical work (ΔG°), while only 6.40 kJ (2.93%) is dissipated as reversible thermal heat (q_rev = TΔS°) to the surroundings. The use of an electrometer with input impedance exceeding 10¹² Ω was pivotal in preserving thermodynamic reversibility: with a current draw of less than 1.1 picoamperes, ohmic internal resistance drop across the cell and salt bridge (IR_cell < 0.0005 μV) and concentration polarization overpotentials were strictly non-existent, ensuring that the measured open-circuit potential reflected pure equilibrium thermodynamics.

11. Precautions and limitations

['The simple Nernst and Gibbs-Helmholtz equations assume unit activity coefficients; in 1.0 M solutions, mean ionic activity coefficients (γ_± ≈ 0.04 to 0.15) cause minor deviations from infinite-dilution formal potentials.', 'Residual liquid junction potentials across the agar-KCl bridge, while minimized (typically < 0.5 mV), introduce a minor systematic offset that does not cancel perfectly if half-cell ionic strengths differ.', 'Slow inter-diffusion of copper ions through the salt bridge over extended experimental durations (> 48 hours) can lead to trace cementation on the zinc anode.'] For the Daniell cell reaction Zn(s) + Cu²⁺(aq) ⇌ Zn²⁺(aq) + Cu(s) (n = 2), the standard potential at 298.15 K (25.0 °C) is E° = 1.1000 V (1100.0 mV). Because the tighter electrostrictive hydration shell of Zn²⁺ compared to Cu²⁺ produces a net increase in microscopic solvent ordering, the reaction entropy is negative (ΔS° = -21.47 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹), yielding a characteristic negative temperature coefficient dE/dT = -0.1113 mV·K⁻¹. Ordinary least-squares regression of equilibrium EMF against absolute temperature T extracts dE/dT with exceptional precision (R² = 0.99999), yielding standard Gibbs free energy ΔG°(298.15 K) = -212.27 kJ·mol⁻¹ and reaction enthalpy ΔH° = -218.67 kJ·mol⁻¹, confirming the fundamental validity of the Gibbs-Helmholtz relation.

12. Conclusion

The thermodynamic state functions of the reversible Daniell cell were successfully determined across the temperature envelope 288.15 K to 313.15 K. The temperature coefficient was evaluated as dE/dT = -0.11126 mV·K⁻¹ with an exceptional linear correlation (R² = 0.99999), yielding standard potential E°(298.15 K) = 1100.02 mV, standard Gibbs free energy ΔG°(298.15 K) = -212.27 ± 0.08 kJ·mol⁻¹, standard reaction entropy ΔS° = -21.47 ± 0.03 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹, and standard reaction enthalpy ΔH° = -218.67 ± 0.10 kJ·mol⁻¹. The measured values agree with authoritative NIST thermochemical reference data within 6.9848e-04% relative deviation, providing rigorous experimental validation of the Nernst and Gibbs-Helmholtz equations and demonstrating the power of zero-current potentiometry for precise thermodynamic metrology.