Chemistry / Moving Boundary Transference Numbers
FREE TO EXPLORE
LABORATORY 35 · NATURAL SCIENCES

Moving Boundary Transference Numbers lab report

A worked moving boundary transference numbers lab report with gravimetric data tables, linear regression graphs, calculations, uncertainty and conclusions.

WORKED EXAMPLE · QUANTITATIVE OBSERVATIONS

A complete example laboratory report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report illustrates formal analytical gravimetry, volumetric calibrations, and linear regression analysis. Replace its observations with your own experimental telemetry when preparing a practical submission.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

Determination of Ionic Transference Numbers by the Moving Boundary Method. Determine the cation transference number (t_+) of hydrogen ions (H⁺) in hydrochloric acid solutions as a function of current and concentration using the precision moving boundary method.

2. Abstract

The cation transference number (t₊) of hydrogen ions (H⁺) and the anion transference number (t₋) of chloride ions (Cl⁻) in 0.1000 M hydrochloric acid were determined at 25.00 ± 0.02 °C using the high-precision moving boundary method. An autogenic boundary was generated between the leading 0.1000 M HCl solution and an in situ formed cadmium chloride (CdCl₂) following electrolyte under a constant galvanostatic direct current of 5.000 ± 0.001 mA. Linear displacement of the sharp refractive index boundary was tracked through a water-jacketed capillary tube (internal radius r = 1.000 mm, cross-sectional area A = 0.031416 cm²) using an optical cathetometer across six uniform time intervals from 3.00 to 18.00 minutes. Multi-point ordinary least-squares regression of swept capillary volume V against elapsed electrolysis time t yielded a displacement slope dV/dt = 0.0256826 cm³·min⁻¹ (25.683 μL·min⁻¹) with an exceptional coefficient of determination R² = 1.00000 and a near-zero intercept b = 1.3333e-06 cm³. Application of the fundamental moving boundary equation yielded a cation transference number t₊(H⁺) = 0.8260 ± 0.0024 and an evaluated anion transference number t₋(Cl⁻) = 0.1740 ± 0.0024. The empirical result exhibits complete concordance with the authoritative literature reference value of 0.8260 (percentage difference = 3.7897e-04%), demonstrating that hydrogen ions carry over 82.6% of the electrical current in aqueous hydrochloric acid due to the anomalously rapid Grotthuss structural proton-hopping mechanism.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

Ionic transference numbers quantify the fractional contribution of individual ionic species to total electrical conduction in an electrolyte solution. While Kohlrausch's law demonstrates that electrical conductivity is an additive colligative property of all coexisting ions, ions migrate at vastly different velocities due to disparities in solvated hydrodynamic radii and conduction mechanisms. The moving boundary method is the most direct, elegant, and metrologically authoritative technique for measuring transference numbers. By tracking the steady-state upward displacement of a self-sharpening refractive boundary between a leading electrolyte (HCl) and an autogenically generated following electrolyte (CdCl₂) under constant galvanostatic current, the cation transference number of hydrogen ions (t_+) is determined with exceptional sub-0.1% precision.

V = \left(\frac{60000 \cdot I \cdot t_+}{F \cdot c}\right) t \implies V = 0.02568 \cdot t \implies t_+ = 0.8260

The primary analytical visualization presents the swept capillary volume V (in cm³, converted from raw cathetometer microliter readings) as a function of elapsed current duration t (in minutes). A linear Cartesian coordinate system is selected based directly on the first-principles moving boundary rate equation V(t) = [ (60,000 · I · t₊) / (F · c) ] · t. Under strictly constant galvanostatic current and unvarying electrolyte concentration, this theoretical governing equation dictates an invariant, constant volumetric displacement rate, demanding a linear plot passing through the origin. Linear least-squares regression across all six experimental points reveals rigorous linearity (R² = 1.00000), verifying that the Kohlrausch regulating condition maintains an unvarying boundary velocity throughout the entire 18-minute run. The linear slope dV/dt = 0.0256826 cm³·min⁻¹ allows direct, unbiased extraction of t₊ without the compounding volumetric errors characteristic of single-point or post-electrolysis chemical titration techniques.

5. Method

  1. Clean the precision bore capillary with warm chromic acid cleaning solution, followed by extensive rinsing with triple-distilled deionized water. Polish the cadmium anode mechanically with fine emery paper to remove oxide films and seat it firmly in the bottom electrode socket.
  2. Fill the capillary carefully with standardized 0.1000 M HCl solution, ensuring no air bubbles adhere to the tube walls or the cadmium electrode face. Mount the Ag/AgCl cathode in the upper reservoir and seal the system.
  3. Circulate constant-temperature water through the outer cooling jacket at 25.00 ± 0.05 °C for 15 minutes to dissipate Joule heating and establish steady radial temperature profiles.
  4. Engage the galvanostat at constant current I = 5.000 mA and start the chronometer. Anodic oxidation of cadmium immediately produces a dense, localized layer of CdCl₂. The refractive index boundary between colorless HCl and denser CdCl₂ becomes sharply defined within 60 seconds.
  5. Align the crosshairs of the traveling cathetometer with the sharp boundary meniscus. Record the boundary position at 3.00-minute intervals (3.00, 6.00, 9.00, 12.00, 15.00, and 18.00 min), converting linear displacement into swept capillary volume V in μL and cm³.
  6. Plot swept volume V (cm³) against elapsed time t (min). Perform linear least-squares regression to extract slope dV/dt. Calculate the cation transference number t_+ = (slope × F × c) / (60000 × I) and evaluate the anion transference number t_- = 1 - t_+.

6. Observations and calculation table

All gravimetric observations were recorded using a calibrated 4-decimal electronic analytical balance enclosed within a draft shield chamber. Volumetric aliquots were dispensed from a Class A burette. Residuals are computed relative to the ordinary least-squares regression line.

Table 1. Seven simulated gravimetric observations; x and y represent dispensed volume and net mass metrics.
No.Elapsed Current Duration t (min)Swept Capillary Volume V (μL)Elapsed Time t (min)Swept Volume V (cm³)Fitted y (g)Residual (g)
13.077.05003.00000.07700.07700.0000
26.0154.10006.00000.15410.15410.0000
39.0231.14009.00000.23110.2311-0.0000
412.0308.190012.00000.30820.3082-0.0000
515.0385.240015.00000.38520.38520.0000
618.0462.290018.00000.46230.46230.0000

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

1. Raw Experimental Observables & Capillary Geometry:\n Elapsed electrolysis current duration t = 3.00 min (180.0 s).\n Swept capillary volume V = 77.05 μL = 0.07705 cm³.\n Precision capillary internal radius r = 1.000 mm (cross-sectional area A = 0.031416 cm²).\n Boundary axial displacement Δx = V / A = 2.453 cm = 24.53 mm.\n\n2. Electric Charge & Faraday Equivalence Formulation:\n Regulated constant galvanostatic current I = 5.000 mA = 0.00500 A.\n Total charge passed Q = I · t_sec = 0.900 Coulombs.\n Faraday constant F = 96,485.3 C·mol⁻¹.\n Total equivalents of charge passed = Q / F = 9.3278e-06 mol electrons.\n\n3. Chemical Transport Across the Moving Boundary:\n Leading electrolyte: standardized hydrochloric acid c(HCl) = 0.1000 M (mol·L⁻¹).\n Moles of H⁺ swept out of capillary volume V = c · (V / 1000) = 7.7050e-06 mol.\n Charge carried solely by H⁺ cations Q₊ = n(H⁺) · F = 0.7434 C.\n Single-point apparent cation transference number t₊ = Q₊ / Q = 0.8260.\n\n4. Multi-Point Linear Least-Squares Regression Across All Observations:\n Linearized moving boundary equation: V(t) = [ (60,000 · I · t₊) / (F · c) ] · t + b.\n Regression slope m = dV/dt = 0.0256827 cm³·min⁻¹ (25.683 μL·min⁻¹).\n Regression Y-intercept b = 0.000000 cm³ (consistent with zero initial displacement within ±0.00001 cm³).\n Coefficient of determination: R² = 1.00000.\n\n5. Extraction of Ionic Transference Numbers & Transport Partitioning:\n Cation Transference Number: t₊(H⁺) = (m · F · c) / (60,000 · I) = 0.8260 (82.60% of total current).\n Anion Transference Number: t₋(Cl⁻) = 1.0000 - t₊ = 0.1740 (17.40% of total current).\n Literature benchmark at 25.00 °C: t₊(H⁺) = 0.8260 (percentage difference = 4.8326e-06%).\n Theoretical limiting ratio at infinite dilution: t₊°(H⁺) = λ₊° / Λₘ° = 349.8 / 426.15 = 0.8208.

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

0.01.20.15.90.310.50.415.20.519.8Elapsed Time t (min)Swept Volume V (cm³)V = 3.0 mL, m = 77.05 gV = 6.0 mL, m = 154.1 gV = 9.0 mL, m = 231.14 gV = 12.0 mL, m = 308.19 gV = 15.0 mL, m = 385.24 gV = 18.0 mL, m = 462.29 g

Circular markers represent empirical gravimetric observations. The solid line represents the ordinary least-squares linear regression fit.

x̄ = 10.5000 mL; ȳ = 0.2697 g
Σ(x − x̄)² = 157.5000 mL²
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 4.0450 g·mL
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 0.02568257 g/mL
b = ȳ − mx̄ = 1.3333e-06 g
Moving Boundary Fit: V = 0.0256826·t + 1.3333e-06 cm³ (dV/dt = 0.02568 cm³·min⁻¹); Cation Transference Number t₊(H⁺) = 0.8260; Anion Transference Number t₋(Cl⁻) = 0.1740

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − theoretical value| / |theoretical value| × 100 = 0.0004%.

For n = 7 gravimetric observations, Σresidual² = 4.1905e-11; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 2.5791e-07. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 3.0132e-06.

Propagating the fit parameters yields an experimental density standard error of 8.2947e-06 dimensionless, with an ideal coefficient of determination R² = 1.000000.

In the high-precision determination of ionic transference numbers by the moving boundary method, metrological uncertainties and electrohydrodynamic boundary conditions are rigorously quantified across optical, galvanostatic, thermostatic, and chemical domains: (1) Traveling Optical Cathetometer & Reticle Resolution: Boundary meniscus displacement is tracked through an optical cathetometer with a vernier drum graduated to 0.01 mm. Sighting repeatability across multiple readings on the sharp Kohlrausch refractive interface contributes a standard height uncertainty u(x) = 0.012 mm. Converted through the calibrated capillary bore cross-sectional area (A = 0.031416 cm²), the volume sighting uncertainty is u(V_sight) = 0.038 μL (0.000038 cm³). (2) Precision Capillary Bore Uniformity & Calibrated Volume: The capillary tube is calibrated via precision mercury slug gravimetry across the entire working column height. The bore diameter is certified at 2.000 ± 0.001 mm, yielding a relative bore cross-sectional area uncertainty u(A)/A = 0.08%. (3) High-Stability Digital Constant-Current Galvanostat: An unvarying direct current of 5.000 mA is supplied by an advanced solid-state constant-current generator with active feedback regulation. Current drift over 20 minutes is maintained below ±0.001 mA, corresponding to a relative uncertainty u(I)/I = 0.020%. Compliance voltage adjusts dynamically (typically 115 to 125 V) as the column resistance increases during Cadmium dissolution. (4) Thermostatic Regulation & Radial Joule Heating: Electrolysis generates electrical Joule heating (P = I²·R ≈ 0.005² × 24,000 Ω ≈ 0.60 W). An external water jacket circulates constant-temperature coolant at 25.00 ± 0.02 °C to dissipate thermal energy. A residual radial temperature gradient (ΔT_radial < 0.04 °C) introduces an estimated convective distortion uncertainty of 0.04%. (5) Analytical Concentration of Leading HCl: Standardized 0.1000 M hydrochloric acid is prepared from constant-boiling analytical stock and titrated against primary standard tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (THAM) with potentiometric end-point detection. The concentration uncertainty is u(c)/c = 0.08%. (6) Multi-Point Linear Regression & Covariance Propagation: The empirical boundary displacement rate m = dV/dt = 0.0256826 cm³·min⁻¹ is evaluated by ordinary least-squares regression over six discrete time coordinates (3.00 to 18.00 min). The standard error of the slope is s_m = 0.0000015 cm³·min⁻¹ (relative uncertainty 0.006%), yielding a coefficient of determination R² = 1.000000. Propagation through the moving boundary formula u_r(t₊) = √[ (u(m)/m)² + (u(I)/I)² + (u(c)/c)² + (u(A)/A)² ] gives a combined relative standard uncertainty u_r(t₊) = 0.14%. For an empirical cation transference number t₊ = 0.8260, the expanded uncertainty at the 95% confidence level (coverage factor k = 2) is U(t₊) = 0.0024 (0.29%), confirming exceptional agreement with the authoritative literature benchmark (0.8260 ± 0.0020) and validating the metrological supremacy of moving boundary cathetometry.

10. Result and discussion

0.8260 = 0.8260 dimensionless
CIPM standard reference value: 0.8260 dimensionless

The experimental results provide profound mechanistic insights into electrokinetic transport phenomena and confirm the metrological authority of the moving boundary method. In typical aqueous symmetrical electrolytes such as potassium chloride (KCl), ionic mobilities are nearly identical (u₊ = 7.62 × 10⁻⁴ cm²·s⁻¹·V⁻¹, u₋ = 7.91 × 10⁻⁴ cm²·s⁻¹·V⁻¹), resulting in balanced transference numbers (t₊ = 0.4906, t₋ = 0.5094 at 25 °C). In stark contrast, our experimental finding for 0.1000 M HCl demonstrates an extreme conduction asymmetry: t₊(H⁺) = 0.8260 and t₋(Cl⁻) = 0.1740. Over 82.6% of the total electrical current is transported by hydrogen cations, and less than 17.4% by chloride anions. This massive disparity cannot be explained by classical Stokesian hydrodynamic drag. Under Stokes' law, an ion's drift velocity is inversely proportional to its solvated hydrodynamic radius (u = |z|e / (6πηr_h)). Because hydronium ions (H₃O⁺) are strongly hydrated by water molecules, hydrodynamic translation of an intact [H(H₂O)₄]⁺ cluster would yield an ionic mobility comparable to that of sodium or lithium (u ≈ 5 × 10⁻⁴ cm²·s⁻¹·V⁻¹), predicting a transference number near 0.45. Instead, hydrogen ions conduct via the Grotthuss proton-hopping mechanism (structural diffusion). An excess proton transfers concertedly along pre-existing hydrogen bonds between neighboring water molecules within fluctuating Zundel [H₅O₂]⁺ and Eigen [H₉O₄]⁺ clusters. This rapid quantum-like charge translocation circumvents the hydrodynamic viscous resistance of the bulk solvent, elevating the limiting ionic conductivity of H⁺ (λ° = 349.8 S·cm²·mol⁻¹) to more than four times that of chloride (λ° = 76.35 S·cm²·mol⁻¹). The self-sharpening stability of the moving boundary was rigorously observed throughout the 18-minute electrolysis. According to Kohlrausch's regulating principle, because the following cadmium chloride electrolyte has a substantially lower conductivity than hydrochloric acid (κ(CdCl₂) << κ(HCl)), continuity of electric current (I = κ · A · E) requires a significantly higher electric field gradient in the following solution (E₂ ≈ 4.8 V/cm) than in the leading solution (E₁ ≈ 1.2 V/cm). Any slower Cd²⁺ ion that accidentally diffuses forward across the boundary enters the lower electric field of the HCl zone, where its drift velocity immediately diminishes, allowing the advancing boundary to overtake it. Conversely, any fast H⁺ ion that lags behind into the CdCl₂ zone encounters the intense electric field E₂, which accelerates it forward back into the leading phase. This automatic restoring force maintained an optical boundary sharpness below 0.05 mm, preventing diffusive broadening and yielding the near-perfect regression correlation R² = 1.00000.

11. Precautions and limitations

['The moving boundary method requires a following electrolyte that satisfies both the Kohlrausch mobility criterion (u_lead > u_foll) and gravitational density stability.', 'Excessive electrical current (> 10 mA) induces thermal Joule heating, creating radial temperature gradients that produce parabolic convective boundary distortion.', 'Volume corrections for electrode reactions and solvent transport become significant at higher electrolyte concentrations (> 0.5 M), requiring dilatometric calibration.'] The moving boundary method operates under the Kohlrausch regulating condition: because the slower following cation (Cd²⁺) has lower mobility than the leading cation (H⁺), continuity of current establishes a steeper electric field in the following phase (E₂ > E₁), creating an active restoring force that continuously sharpens the boundary against molecular diffusion. The swept volume V of the capillary increases strictly linearly with elapsed time t: V = [60,000 · I · t_+ / (F · c)] · t. For 0.1000 M HCl at 25.00 °C under a constant current of 5.000 mA, the boundary sweeps volume at a steady rate of 0.02568 cm³/min (25.68 μL/min). Linear least-squares regression of swept volume against elapsed time yields an empirical cation transference number t_+ = 0.8260, confirming the extraordinary dominance of the Grotthuss proton-hopping mechanism in aqueous acid conduction.

12. Conclusion

The cation transference number of hydrogen ions in 0.1000 M hydrochloric acid at 25.00 °C was successfully determined as t₊(H⁺) = 0.8260 ± 0.0024 via precision moving boundary cathetometry, with an evaluated chloride anion transference number t₋(Cl⁻) = 0.1740 ± 0.0024. The experimental displacement rate dV/dt = 0.0256826 cm³·min⁻¹ demonstrated exceptional linearity (R² = 1.00000) across the entire 18-minute electrolysis run, matching the authoritative reference benchmark (0.8260) with a relative deviation of only 3.7897e-04%. The quantitative results definitively corroborate the Kohlrausch self-sharpening regulating theory and provide rigorous experimental validation of the Grotthuss proton-hopping conduction mechanism in aqueous solutions.