Physics / Boyle’s Law
FREE TO EXPLORE
EXPERIMENT 31 · PHYSICS LABORATORY

Boyle’s Law lab report

A worked boyle’s law lab report with simulated observation tables, graph, calculations, uncertainty and results.

WORKED EXAMPLE · SIMULATED OBSERVATIONS

A complete example report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report shows the method and arithmetic. It is not evidence of a physical experiment. Replace its observations with your own measurements when preparing a real lab report.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

Verification of Boyle’s Law and Determination of the Isothermal State Constant for an Ideal Gas. Verify Boyle’s law for a confined sample of dry air at constant room temperature by measuring absolute gas pressure P as a function of volume V using a mercury J-tube manometer, and determine the isothermal Boyle state constant k = P · V via linear regression of absolute pressure P against reciprocal volume 1/V.

2. Abstract

Five observations were generated from the ideal teaching model over the settings listed below. A straight-line fit gave an estimate of Boyle isothermal state constant k of 3.0399 J, differing by 0.005% from the model value. The reported scatter comes from scale rounding and any stated model approximation, not measured laboratory noise.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

Boyle's law represents the foundational empirical cornerstone of pneumatic physics and classical thermodynamics, enunciating the fundamental inverse proportionality between the absolute pressure and the volume of a confined mass of gas held at invariant thermodynamic temperature. First published in 1662 by the Anglo-Irish natural philosopher Robert Boyle in his seminal treatise 'New Experiments Physico-Mechanicall, Touching the Spring of the Air, and its Effects'—and independently verified with rigorous mathematical formalism in 1676 by the French physicist Edme Mariotte (whence it is frequently termed Boyle-Mariotte's law)—this governing physical principle dismantled the Aristotelian notion of horror vacui and established gases as elastic fluids composed of particulate entities whose macroscopic mechanical manifestations derive from microscopic momentum exchanges. Under isothermal thermodynamic conditions (T = constant), the mechanical work performed upon a gas during quasi-static compression increases its volumetric energy density: P · V = n R T = k, where n is the molar quantity of gas, R = 8.31446 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ is the universal gas constant, and k is the isothermal Boyle state constant (possessing units of joules, equivalent to Pa m³ or N m). In the classical laboratory configuration, a clean, dry air sample is hermetically confined within a calibrated uniform glass bore manometer tube closed at the upper extremity, bounded inferiorly by an adjustable liquid mercury meniscus column. The lower end of the graduated closed tube communicates through heavy-walled flexible rubber or elastomeric tubing with an open leveling tube mounted upon a vertical metric slider. By adjusting the vertical elevation of the open reservoir relative to the closed specimen tube, the experimenter imposes variable hydrostatic mercury head pressures Δh = h_open − h_closed upon the trapped air column. The absolute pressure P exerted upon the gas is established by summing the local barometric atmospheric pressure B (measured with an auxiliary Fortin mercury barometer) and the differential manometer column height: P = B + Δh. By plotting the resulting absolute pressure P against the reciprocal of the gas volume (1/V), the curvilinear hyperbolic Boyle isotherm P(V) is linearized into a strictly origin-intercepting linear relationship y = m x whose gradient m directly delivers the physical state constant k = n R T. High-precision least-squares regression across systematic compression and expansion intervals provides an exemplary verification of ideal gas behavior, elucidating the macroscopic operational envelope within which atmospheric air strictly approximates the thermodynamic ideal gas.

P = k / V = k · (1/V) ⇔ Y = k · X ⇔ k = S

The calculation fits y = mx + b in SI units. The graph may display scaled axes for readability; those display factors are removed before calculating the physical result. The gradient has units J.

5. Method

  1. Read the prevailing ambient laboratory atmospheric pressure B from the Fortin precision mercury barometer to ±0.1 mmHg, applying standard capillary and brass-scale temperature corrections to establish the exact reference datum B = 101.325 kPa (760.0 mmHg). Record the baseline room temperature T_0 = 20.00 °C.
  2. Adjust the height of the movable open leveling tube until the mercury meniscus in the open tube aligns precisely in the same horizontal plane as the mercury meniscus in the closed specimen tube (h_open = h_closed), establishing a differential hydrostatic head of Δh = 0. Verify that the enclosed air volume corresponds to the nominal baseline volume V_0 = 30.0 cm³.
  3. Execute the compression series by systematically raising the open leveling tube above the closed tube along its vertical rack slider, imposing positive hydrostatic mercury heads to compress the air sample to designated volumes of V = 25.0 cm³ and V = 20.0 cm³. Align the sliding vernier index with the apex of each meniscus to eliminate parallax.
  4. Following each vertical adjustment of the leveling tube, pause for a dwell period of at least two to three minutes before recording pressure values. Observe the thermometer immersed in the adjacent thermal buffer to verify that the air column returns to baseline temperature T_0 = 20.00 °C.
  5. Execute the expansion series by lowering the open leveling tube beneath the closed specimen tube, applying negative hydrostatic heads to expand the confined air column to volumes of V = 35.0 cm³ and V = 40.0 cm³. Record the open tube height h_open and closed tube height h_closed, computing the differential head Δh = h_open − h_closed.
  6. Compute the absolute pressure P = B + Δh (in pascals and kilopascals) and the reciprocal volume X = 1/V (in m⁻³ and display L⁻¹) for each of the five observation stations. Perform an ordinary least-squares linear regression of P against 1/V, evaluating the slope m = k, the y-intercept b, the statistical standard error, and the coefficient of determination R².

6. Observations and calculation table

All observations use fixed model settings. Values are rounded only at the instrument reading stage; further calculations use full precision. Repeated physical trials are not claimed.

Table 1. Five simulated measurements; x and y are in SI units.
No.Volume V (cm³)Absolute pressure P (kPa)x (SI)y (SI)Fitted y (SI)Residual (SI)
120.0151.9950000.00000151990.00000151990.67443-0.67443
225.0121.5940000.00000121590.00000121591.51602-1.51602
330.0101.3333333.33333101330.00000101325.410424.58958
435.086.8528571.4285786850.0000086849.620710.37929
540.075.9925000.0000075990.0000075992.77842-2.77842

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

Confined volume V = 20.0 cm³ = 0.000020 m³; reciprocal volume 1/V = 50000.0 m⁻³; observed absolute pressure P = 151.99 kPa = 151990 Pa; single-trial constant k = P · V = 151990 × (0.000020) = 3.0398 J. Linear regression of P against 1/V across all volume settings yields the reported isothermal state constant.

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

68.3922.5091.1930.00113.9937.50136.7945.00159.5952.50Reciprocal volume 1/V (L⁻¹)Absolute pressure P (kPa)

Dots show the sample observations. The line is the ordinary least-squares fit.

x̄ = 35380.95238; ȳ = 107550.00000
Σ(x − x̄)² = 3.9338e+08
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 1.1958e+09
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 3.03991584
b = ȳ − mx̄ = -5.11759281
Slope S = 3.03992 J; Isothermal state constant k = PV = S = 3.040 J

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − model value| / |model value| × 100 = 0.0055%. Percentage difference is not experimental uncertainty.

For n = 5 observations, Σresidual² = 31.68089; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 1.6384e-04. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 5.97638.

Propagating only the relevant fit coefficient gives a fit-only standard error of 1.6384e-04 J. This is a one-standard-error quantity under the regression assumptions. Deterministic rounded model data do not supply a complete physical uncertainty budget.

Barometric pressure fluctuations during the observation period (±0.2 mmHg), capillary depression at the mercury-glass menisci in unequal tube diameters (±0.3 mm), room temperature drift affecting isothermal conditions (±0.2°C), non-uniformity in the internal cross-section of the graduated closed tube, parallax errors in reading the mercury columns, and slight trace moisture in the confined air contributing water vapor pressure departures from ideal behavior contribute experimental uncertainty. The OLS regression standard error reflects random reading scatter, but does not capture unmodelled capillary curvature offsets or ambient barometric drift.

10. Result and discussion

k = 3.0399 J
Model comparison value: 3.0398 J

The observations follow the stated model relationship. Check whether the intercept and residual pattern suggest a systematic offset or a missing approximation. Agreement with the model does not independently verify its input constants.

11. Precautions and limitations

The teaching simulation models an ideal gas under strict isothermal conditions at constant room temperature T_0 = 20.00 °C (293.15 K) and standard barometric pressure B = 101.325 kPa (760.0 mmHg). In physical laboratory practice, barometric pressure drifts over hours as atmospheric weather fronts pass (±0.2 to 0.5 mmHg), capillary depression differences at the mercury-glass menisci introduce minor hydrostatic offsets (±0.2 to 0.4 mm) if tube diameters are not perfectly matched, room temperature fluctuations alter the gas temperature by ±0.2 °C, slight non-uniformity in the bore cross-section of the closed glass tube produces volume scale calibration deviations, and the presence of trace water vapor in non-dehydrated air causes slight departures from ideal gas behavior due to variable saturated vapor pressure contributions. The simulation evaluates absolute pressure using P = k / V, where the reference state constant is k = P_0 V_0 = 101,325 Pa × 30.0 × 10⁻⁶ m³ = 3.03975 J (confined volume V in cm³, with 1 cm³ = 10⁻⁶ m³). The differential mercury head is computed from Δh = (P − B) / (ρ_Hg g), with ρ_Hg = 13,546 kg m⁻³, g = 9.80665 m s⁻², and standard atmosphere B = 101.325 kPa. The calculated pressure in kPa is rounded to 0.01 kPa to simulate precision digital manometry. Ordinary least-squares regression of P (Pa) against 1/V (m⁻³) across five volume settings (20.0, 25.0, 30.0, 35.0, 40.0 cm³) yields the reported isothermal state constant k and statistical uncertainty.

12. Conclusion

The worked example illustrates how to obtain Boyle isothermal state constant k from measurements, graph variables and a fitted coefficient. The estimate is 3.0399 J. A real experiment must additionally evaluate the apparatus-specific uncertainties and corrections described above.