Physics / Charles’ Law (Volume Expansion)
FREE TO EXPLORE
EXPERIMENT 32 · PHYSICS LABORATORY

Charles’ Law (Volume Expansion) lab report

A worked charles’ law (volume expansion) lab report with simulated observation tables, graph, calculations, uncertainty and results.

WORKED EXAMPLE · SIMULATED OBSERVATIONS

A complete example report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report shows the method and arithmetic. It is not evidence of a physical experiment. Replace its observations with your own measurements when preparing a real lab report.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

Determination of the Thermal Expansion Coefficient of a Gas at Constant Pressure (Charles’ Law). Determine the thermal coefficient of volume expansion of dry air at constant atmospheric pressure (β) by measuring the expansion volume V of a bulb-confined air sample across temperatures from 0.0 °C to 80.0 °C using a constant-pressure air dilatometer with a mercury leveling reservoir, and extrapolate to determine the absolute zero of temperature.

2. Abstract

Five observations were generated from the ideal teaching model over the settings listed below. A straight-line fit gave an estimate of Volume expansion coefficient β of 0.003661 K⁻¹, differing by 0.014% from the model value. The reported scatter comes from scale rounding and any stated model approximation, not measured laboratory noise.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

Charles' law—frequently designated the law of Charles and Gay-Lussac or Gay-Lussac's law of isobaric expansion—constitutes one of the foundational empirical Pillars of classical pneumatics and thermodynamic science, enunciating that under constant absolute pressure, the volume of a confined mass of an ideal gas expands linearly with increasing thermodynamic temperature. While preliminary qualitative observations were recorded in 1699 and 1702 by Guillaume Amontons, the quantitative relationship was experimentally formulated in unpublished work around 1787 by the French aeronautical pioneer and physicist Jacques Alexandre César Charles, who demonstrated that equal volumes of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide undergo identical volumetric expansion when warmed from the freezing point to the boiling point of water. In 1802, the brilliant French chemist and physicist Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac published the definitive quantitative treatise establishing that all common atmospheric gases exhibit a universal isobaric volume expansion coefficient of approximately 1/267 (later refined by Henri Victor Regnault in 1842 to the modern standard value of 1/273.15 K⁻¹ ≈ 0.003661 K⁻¹). The mathematical formulation of isobaric dilatation relative to the ice-point volume V_0 at 0 °C is expressed as V_t = V_0 (1 + β t), where t is the Celsius temperature, V_0 is the initial volume occupied by the gas at 0.00 °C, and β is the thermal volume expansion coefficient at constant pressure. In the classical laboratory constant-pressure air thermometer (or dilatometer), a dry air sample is enclosed within a spherical glass bulb of calibrated volume V_0 completely submerged within a stirred, variable-temperature liquid bath. The bulb neck communicates via an unheated capillary tube with a precision graduated glass manometer limb and an adjustable liquid mercury leveling reservoir. By systematically shifting the vertical elevation of the leveling reservoir after every temperature station so that the mercury menisci in both limbs stand at exactly equal horizontal elevations, the internal gas pressure is held strictly invariant at prevailing ambient atmospheric pressure (P = B). Plotting the measured gas volume V_t against Celsius temperature t produces an exceptionally straight line whose slope m = V_0 β and y-intercept b = V_0 directly yield the thermal expansion coefficient β = m / b. Crucially, extrapolating the linear regression line leftward to the point of theoretical vanishing volume (V_t → 0) determines the absolute zero of temperature: T_0 = −1 / β ≈ −273.15 °C, establishing the fundamental physical concept of the absolute thermodynamic Kelvin temperature scale.

V_t = V_0 (1 + β t) = V_0 + (V_0 β) · t ⇔ Y = m X + b ⇔ β = m / V_0 = m / b

The calculation fits y = mx + b in SI units. The graph may display scaled axes for readability; those display factors are removed before calculating the physical result. The gradient has units m³ K⁻¹.

5. Method

  1. Fill the thermal bath with finely shaved pure distilled ice and water, ensuring the glass bulb T₁ is completely submerged up to the index mark on the capillary stem. Vigorously agitate the slurry for several minutes until the thermometer reads 0.00 °C. Adjust the movable leveling reservoir until the mercury meniscus in the open tube aligns precisely with the meniscus in the graduated tube T₂ (isobaric condition, Δh = 0). Record the initial ice-point volume V_0 = 100.00 cm³.
  2. Replace the ice slurry with distilled water and energize the bath heater, setting the thermal controller to warm the bath to the first elevated target temperature of 20.0 °C. Maintain continuous mechanical stirring to prevent vertical convection currents or thermal boundary layers around the glass bulb.
  3. Upon reaching each target temperature station (20.0 °C, 40.0 °C, 60.0 °C, 80.0 °C), reduce heater power and maintain a dwell time of at least three to four minutes. Confirm that the thermometer reading remains steady within ±0.05 °C and the expanding mercury meniscus in tube T₂ has ceased downward movement.
  4. Gently manipulate the rack-and-pinion thumb drive on the movable reservoir slider to lower the open mercury tube until its liquid meniscus matches the exact horizontal elevation of the meniscus in graduated tube T₂. Sight across the horizontal level index with an optical magnifier to verify zero differential height (Δh = h_open − h_closed = 0).
  5. Read the total gas volume V_t on the graduated scale of tube T₂ at the crest of the convex mercury meniscus, recording the volume to the nearest 0.05 cm³. Subtract the initial ice-point volume V_0 to compute the net thermal expansion volume ΔV = V_t − V_0.
  6. Compile the data table of volume V (in cm³ and SI units of m³) versus temperature t (in °C). Perform an ordinary least-squares linear regression fitting V = m · t + b, compute the isobaric volume expansion coefficient β = m / b, evaluate its statistical standard error, and project the regression line to V = 0 to determine the experimental absolute zero T_0 = −b / m.

6. Observations and calculation table

All observations use fixed model settings. Values are rounded only at the instrument reading stage; further calculations use full precision. Repeated physical trials are not claimed.

Table 1. Five simulated measurements; x and y are in SI units.
No.Bath temperature t (°C)Confined volume V (cm³)x (SI)y (SI)Fitted y (SI)Residual (SI)
10.0100.000.000001.0000e-049.9998e-052.0000e-09
220.0107.3220.000001.0732e-041.0732e-04-1.0000e-09
340.0114.6440.000001.1464e-041.1464e-04-4.0000e-09
460.0121.9760.000001.2197e-041.2197e-043.0000e-09
580.0129.2980.000001.2929e-041.2929e-040.00000

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

Water bath temperature t = 0.0 °C = 273.15 K; observed volume V = 100.00 cm³ = 0.00010000 m³; thermal volume expansion ΔV = 0.00 cm³; single-reading estimate β = ΔV / (V₀ · t) = (0.00 × 10⁻⁶) / (1.000 × 10⁻⁴ × 0.1) = 0.000000 K⁻¹. Linear regression of V against t across all temperature stations yields the reported volume expansion coefficient.

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

97.07-8.00105.8616.00114.6440.00123.4364.00132.2288.00Temperature t (°C)Volume V (cm³)

Dots show the sample observations. The line is the ordinary least-squares fit.

x̄ = 40.00000; ȳ = 1.1464e-04
Σ(x − x̄)² = 4000.00000
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 0.00146
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 3.6615e-07
b = ȳ − mx̄ = 9.9998e-05
Slope S = 3.6615e-07 m³ K⁻¹; V₀ = 1.000 × 10⁻⁴ m³; β = S / V₀ = 0.003661 K⁻¹; Extrapolated T₀ = -b / S = -273.11 °C

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − model value| / |model value| × 100 = 0.0139%. Percentage difference is not experimental uncertainty.

For n = 5 observations, Σresidual² = 3.0000e-17; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 5.0000e-11. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 2.4495e-09.

Propagating only the relevant fit coefficient gives a fit-only standard error of 5.0000e-07 K⁻¹. This is a one-standard-error quantity under the regression assumptions. Deterministic rounded model data do not supply a complete physical uncertainty budget.

Temperature gradients throughout the water heating bath during continuous mechanical stirring (±0.2 °C), thermal response lag of the precision thermometer, capillary stem volume exclusion (a small fraction of the gas column in the capillary remains at intermediate temperature between bath and room air, ~0.8%), meniscus parallax error across the graduated leveling tube (±0.05 cm³), atmospheric barometric fluctuations over the heating cycle (±0.2 mmHg), and slight thermal expansion of the glass bulb envelope (borosilicate glass volume expansion α_v ≈ 10 × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹) contribute experimental uncertainty. The OLS regression standard error reflects random scatter across temperature stations, but does not capture unmodelled capillary dead-space gradients or glass envelope expansion.

10. Result and discussion

β = 0.003661 K⁻¹
Model comparison value: 0.003661 K⁻¹

The observations follow the stated model relationship. Check whether the intercept and residual pattern suggest a systematic offset or a missing approximation. Agreement with the model does not independently verify its input constants.

11. Precautions and limitations

The teaching simulation models an ideal gas under isobaric conditions at constant atmospheric pressure B = 101.325 kPa (760.0 mmHg) and initial bulb volume V_0 = 100.00 cm³ at 0.00 °C. In physical laboratory experiments, temperature non-uniformity across the heated water bath introduces minor temperature measurement offsets (±0.2 °C), thermal response latency in the thermometer sensor causes reading delays during heating, capillary stem volume exclusion (a small fraction of the gas column in the capillary stem remains outside the bath at room temperature, ~0.8%), meniscus leveling parallax error across the graduated tube (±0.05 cm³), atmospheric barometric drift over the heating run (±0.2 mmHg), and slight thermal expansion of the borosilicate glass bulb envelope (borosilicate volume expansion α_v ≈ 9.9 × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹) contribute experimental uncertainty. The simulation evaluates confined gas volume using V_t = V_0 (1 + β_ref · t), where V_0 = 100.00 cm³ is the ice-point volume, β_ref = 1 / 273.15 K⁻¹ is the ideal gas volume expansion coefficient, and t is the bath temperature in °C. The volume in cm³ is rounded to 0.01 cm³ to simulate precision burette dilatometry. Ordinary least-squares regression of volume V (m³) against temperature t (°C) across five temperature stations (0.0, 20.0, 40.0, 60.0, 80.0 °C) yields the reported thermal volume expansion coefficient β = m / b and extrapolated absolute zero T_0 = −b / m.

12. Conclusion

The worked example illustrates how to obtain Volume expansion coefficient β from measurements, graph variables and a fitted coefficient. The estimate is 0.003661 K⁻¹. A real experiment must additionally evaluate the apparatus-specific uncertainties and corrections described above.