1. Title and aim
The Heat Equivalent of Electrical Energy: Joule's Law of Electrical Heating. To determine the electrical and mechanical equivalent of heat (Joule's constant J) by electrical calorimeter heating, verify Joule's law of electric power dissipation (W = V I t), and evaluate radiation cooling corrections.
2. Abstract
Five observations were generated from the ideal teaching model over the settings listed below. A straight-line fit gave an estimate of electrical equivalent of heat of 4.1858 J cal⁻¹, differing by 0.004% from the model value. The reported scatter comes from scale rounding and any stated model approximation, not measured laboratory noise.
3. Apparatus and fixed settings
- Precision Electrical Immersion Calorimeter: Provides a double-walled nickel-plated copper vessel with an insulating air jacket, phenolic lid, and internal immersion heating coil (R = 4.00 Ω) submerged in 250.0 g of distilled water with a calibrated water equivalent of 9.3 g (system heat capacity C_sys = 259.3 cal/°C).
- Regulated High-Current DC Power Supply: Supplies a stable, low-ripple constant direct voltage (V = 10.00 V) and current (I = 2.500 A) to deliver a steady electrical dissipation power P = 25.00 W throughout each heating interval.
- Calibrated Digital DC Voltmeter & Ammeter: Monitors the potential difference across the immersion coil (10.00 V ± 0.01 V) and loop current (2.500 A ± 0.002 A) to continuously measure electrical work W = V · I · t with high precision.
- Fractional-Degree Laboratory Thermometer: Measures water temperature from 15.00 °C to 45.00 °C with 0.02 °C resolution, immersed at the geometric center of the stirred water volume.
- Continuous Motorized Spiral Stirrer: Circulates the water volume gently and continuously to eliminate localized hot spots around the heating coil without adding appreciable mechanical frictional heat.
- Digital Laboratory Chronometer / Stopclock: Times the duration of electrical current flow with 0.01 s precision from 120.0 s to 720.0 s for exact energy computation.
- Distilled water mass: m_w = 250.0 g; specific heat capacity c_w = 1.000 cal/(g °C)
- Calorimeter copper vessel mass: 100.0 g (c_Cu = 0.093 cal/(g °C), water equivalent = 9.3 g)
- Total effective system heat capacity: C_sys = 250.0 + 9.3 = 259.3 cal/°C
- Initial baseline equilibrium temperature: T₀ = 20.00 °C (equal to ambient room temperature)
- Electrical heating power: P = V · I = 10.00 V × 2.500 A = 25.00 W
- Heating durations sampled: t = 120 s to 720 s (2.0 to 12.0 min) in 120 s increments
4. Theory and graph choice
Joule's law of electrical heating establishes that the electrical energy delivered by a power supply is converted quantitatively into thermal internal energy. In an electrical calorimeter, a submerged heating coil of resistance R carries current I under potential difference V for duration t, dissipating electrical energy W = V · I · t. This energy is absorbed by the surrounding water and calorimeter vessel, raising their temperature by ΔT according to Q = C_sys · ΔT. By measuring the temperature rise across six distinct heating durations and applying linear regression, students determine Joule's constant (J = W / Q), verify the electrical equivalent of heat (J = 4.1860 J/cal), and calculate the heat equivalent of electrical energy (a = 1/J = 0.2389 cal/J).
The calculation fits y = mx + b in SI units. The graph may display scaled axes for readability; those display factors are removed before calculating the physical result. The gradient has units J cal⁻¹.
5. Method
- Weigh the clean, dry inner copper calorimeter vessel on a balance, add exactly 250.0 g of distilled water, and re-weigh to verify total mass. Place the inner vessel inside the outer insulating air jacket, seat the phenolic lid, and insert the immersion heating coil, motorized stirrer, and fractional-degree thermometer.
- Activate the motorized stirrer at gentle speed and allow the calorimeter system 5 minutes to reach thermal equilibrium with the ambient laboratory. Read and record the initial quiescent temperature T₀ = 20.00 °C on the fractional-degree thermometer.
- Connect the regulated DC power supply in series with the ammeter and immersion heating coil. Connect the digital voltmeter directly across the coil terminal posts (four-wire Kelvin sensing) to exclude lead resistance drops. Energize the supply momentarily to set V = 10.00 V and I = 2.500 A (P = 25.00 W), then open the main switch.
- Simultaneously close the power switch and start the digital chronometer. Maintain continuous gentle stirring while monitoring the voltmeter and ammeter to verify constant power delivery. Run the heating for an initial duration of 120.0 s (2.0 min, delivering W = 3000 J), open the switch, and continue stirring until the thermometer reaches its maximum stabilized reading T.
- Repeat the timed heating runs for cumulative durations of 240.0 s (6000 J), 360.0 s (9000 J), 480.0 s (12000 J), 600.0 s (15000 J), and 720.0 s (18000 J), recording the peak stabilized temperature T at each duration. Compute the temperature rise ΔT = T − T₀ and the corresponding heat absorbed Q = C_sys · ΔT in calories.
- Plot heat absorbed Q (in calories) on the horizontal axis and electrical energy W = V · I · t (in Joules) on the vertical axis. Compute ordinary least-squares linear regression to determine the slope J = ΔW / ΔQ (in J/cal) and the vertical intercept b. Calculate the heat equivalent of electrical energy a = 1 / J (in cal/J) and compare against standard reference values.
6. Observations and calculation table
All observations use fixed model settings. Values are rounded only at the instrument reading stage; further calculations use full precision. Repeated physical trials are not claimed.
| No. | Heating duration t (s) | Calorimeter temperature T (°C) | x (SI) | y (SI) | Fitted y (SI) | Residual (SI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120 | 22.76 | 715.66800 | 3000.00000 | 2996.38505 | 3.61495 |
| 2 | 240 | 25.53 | 1433.92900 | 6000.00000 | 6002.89615 | -2.89615 |
| 3 | 360 | 28.29 | 2149.59700 | 9000.00000 | 8998.55342 | 1.44658 |
| 4 | 480 | 31.06 | 2867.85800 | 12000.00000 | 12005.06452 | -5.06452 |
| 5 | 600 | 33.82 | 3583.52600 | 15000.00000 | 15000.72179 | -0.72179 |
| 6 | 720 | 36.58 | 4299.19400 | 18000.00000 | 17996.37906 | 3.62094 |
Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓
7. Worked calculation for one observation
8. Graph, gradient and final calculation
Dots show the sample observations. The line is the ordinary least-squares fit.
Σ(x − x̄)² = 8.9892e+06
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 3.7627e+07
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 4.18581978
b = ȳ − mx̄ = 0.72777736
Slope S = J = 4.1858 J cal⁻¹; Intercept b = 0.73 J; Electrical equivalent of heat J = 4.1858 J cal⁻¹ (reference: 4.1860 J cal⁻¹); Heat equivalent of electrical energy a = 1 / J = 0.238902 cal J⁻¹ (theoretical: 0.23889 cal J⁻¹)
9. Uncertainty and comparison
Percentage difference = |estimate − model value| / |model value| × 100 = 0.0043%. Percentage difference is not experimental uncertainty.
For n = 5 observations, Σresidual² = 62.82970; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 0.00132. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 3.68939.
Propagating only the relevant fit coefficient gives a fit-only standard error of 0.00132 J cal⁻¹. This is a one-standard-error quantity under the regression assumptions. Deterministic rounded model data do not supply a complete physical uncertainty budget.
Calorimeter convective and radiative heat loss to the ambient environment (mitigated by starting the calorimeter water at an initial temperature T₀ below ambient room temperature so that ambient heat absorption during the first half cancels radiative loss during the second half according to Rumford’s equal temperature differential principle), thermometer thermal lag and stem emergence cooling (minimized by continuous gentle mechanical stirring with a spiral stirrer and using a finely graduated fractional-degree thermometer), uncertainty in the water equivalent of the calorimeter vessel and immersion accessories (W_eq = 9.3 ± 0.3 g, contributing ~0.1% to C_sys = 259.3 cal/°C), DC power supply voltage ripple and drift (regulated within ±0.01 V and ±0.002 A, with four-wire Kelvin potential sensing directly at the heater coil binding posts bypassing lead resistance drops), and chronometer switching synchronization (±0.2 s over 120 s to 720 s durations, <0.1%) govern the uncertainty envelope. Ordinary least-squares regression of electrical work W against heat absorbed Q averages out thermometer meniscus quantization and minor residual cooling deviations, with the slope isolating the pure electrical equivalent of heat J and the vertical intercept isolating any baseline thermal offset.
10. Result and discussion
Model comparison value: 4.1860 J cal⁻¹
The observations follow the stated model relationship. Check whether the intercept and residual pattern suggest a systematic offset or a missing approximation. Agreement with the model does not independently verify its input constants.
11. Precautions and limitations
- Maintain continuous gentle stirring to ensure uniform water temperature throughout the vessel without adding frictional heat.
- Connect the voltmeter leads directly to the calorimeter binding posts to avoid measuring lead resistance drops.
- Keep the heating coil completely submerged in water at all times to prevent burnout and ensure 100% heat transfer.
- Wait for the thermometer reading to reach its absolute peak after switching off the heater before recording the final temperature.
- Ensure the starting temperature is slightly below room temperature so that ambient heat gain cancels post-heating cooling loss.
Calculations assume uniform thermal mixing without fluid stagnation, negligible heat loss to the ambient environment under Rumford radiation compensation, and negligible mechanical energy added by the stirrer. Real calorimeters exhibit small convection losses governed by Newton’s law of cooling (dQ/dt = k(T − T_env)) and slight temperature lag in the thermometer bulb during rapid heating.
12. Conclusion
The worked example illustrates how to obtain electrical equivalent of heat from measurements, graph variables and a fitted coefficient. The estimate is 4.1858 J cal⁻¹. A real experiment must additionally evaluate the apparatus-specific uncertainties and corrections described above.