Physics / Electrostatics & Coulomb's Law
FREE TO EXPLORE
EXPERIMENT 43 · PHYSICS LABORATORY

Electrostatics & Coulomb's Law lab report

A worked electrostatics & coulomb's law lab report with simulated observation tables, graph, calculations, uncertainty and results.

WORKED EXAMPLE · SIMULATED OBSERVATIONS

A complete example report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report shows the method and arithmetic. It is not evidence of a physical experiment. Replace its observations with your own measurements when preparing a real lab report.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

Electrostatics: Coulomb's Law, Electric Induction, and Charge Quantification. To investigate electrostatic charge production by friction and induction, verify Faraday's ice-pail experiment and charge conservation, measure the electrostatic force between charged spheres as a function of distance using a Coulomb torsion balance, confirm the inverse-square law, and determine Coulomb's constant and the permittivity of free space using linear regression.

2. Abstract

Five observations were generated from the ideal teaching model over the settings listed below. A straight-line fit gave an estimate of Coulomb constant k_e of 8.9876e+09 N m² C⁻², differing by 0.000% from the model value. The reported scatter comes from scale rounding and any stated model approximation, not measured laboratory noise.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

Electrostatics constitutes the cornerstone of classical electromagnetism, describing the fundamental forces, fields, and potentials produced by stationary electric charges. First quantified systematically by Charles-Augustin de Coulomb in 1785 using his delicate torsion balance, the electrostatic force between two point charges q₁ and q₂ separated by distance r in vacuum obeys the fundamental inverse-square relationship: F = (1 / 4πε₀) (q₁ q₂ / r²) = k_e (q₁ q₂ / r²), where k_e = 1 / (4πε₀) ≈ 8.98755 × 10⁹ N m² C⁻² is Coulomb's constant and ε₀ ≈ 8.85419 × 10⁻¹² F m⁻¹ is the permittivity of free space. Like Newton's law of universal gravitation, Coulomb's law exhibits an inverse-square dependence on distance governed by the geometry of three-dimensional Euclidean space, as formalized by Gauss's flux theorem: ∮ E · dA = Q_enc / ε₀. However, unlike gravity, electrostatic forces are bipolar: charges of like sign repel each other, while charges of opposite sign attract. When two small, identical conducting spheres are charged to equal potentials and placed within a draft-free chamber, the repulsive electrostatic force F deflects a suspended balance beam. By rotating a calibrated torsion head to restore the beam to its initial null position, the applied restoring torque τ = κ θ directly balances the electrostatic torque F · b, yielding an absolute force measurement in the micronewton (μN) regime. Simultaneously, the electrostatic behavior of conductors is governed by Gauss's law: in electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field within the bulk of a conductor is identically zero (E = 0), and all excess charge resides exclusively on the outer surface, as demonstrated by Michael Faraday's historic 1843 ice-pail experiment. Furthermore, the surface charge density σ concentrates at regions of high surface curvature (σ ∝ 1/R), generating intense localized electric fields capable of ionizing ambient air into a luminous corona discharge. By recording the electrostatic force F across various separation distances r, ordinary least-squares regression of F against the geometric variable 1/r² yields a strictly linear plot with slope m = k_e q₁ q₂. From this slope and the known sphere charges, students determine Coulomb's constant k_e and the permittivity of free space ε₀ with remarkable precision, bridging classical electrostatic induction, Faraday shielding, and continuum field theory.

F = k_e q_1 q_2 \left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \iff y = m x + b \iff k_e = \frac{m}{q^2}, \quad \varepsilon_0 = \frac{1}{4\pi k_e}

The calculation fits y = mx + b in SI units. The graph may display scaled axes for readability; those display factors are removed before calculating the physical result. The gradient has units N m².

5. Method

  1. Inspect the torsion balance glass chamber and verify that the internal silica gel desiccant is active. Clean the insulating glass surfaces and quartz suspension rod with anhydrous ethanol, and verify that the relative humidity inside the chamber reads below 25%.
  2. Adjust the leveling screws of the balance until the suspended dielectric beam swings freely without touching the chamber walls. Rotate the top torsion head dial until the index hair on the suspended sphere A aligns exactly with the chamber zero mark when both spheres are uncharged.
  3. Connect the charging probe to the 3.0 kV regulated DC supply. Touch the probe simultaneously to the suspended sphere A and sliding sphere B while they are in contact, depositing an equal charge of q1 = q2 = 20.0 nC on both spheres. Verify the charge magnitude with the Faraday ice pail and electrometer.
  4. Advance the sliding carrier to position sphere B at a center-to-center separation distance of r = 4.0 cm from sphere A. As electrostatic repulsion deflects sphere A, rotate the torsion head dial until sphere A is restored precisely to its original zero mark. Record the restoring angle theta and calculate the electrostatic force F in micro-newtons.
  5. Repeat the torsion null measurement for six discrete separation distances (r = 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0 cm). For each station, record the separation distance r, the inverse square 1/r^2, and the measured repulsive force F.
  6. Using the proof plane, sample the surface charge density from the sphere and transfer it into the Faraday ice pail to confirm zero interior charge and verify that total charge has not decayed significantly during the run.

6. Observations and calculation table

All observations use fixed model settings. Values are rounded only at the instrument reading stage; further calculations use full precision. Repeated physical trials are not claimed.

Table 1. Five simulated measurements; x and y are in SI units.
No.Separation distance r (cm)Electrostatic force F (μN)x (SI)y (SI)Fitted y (SI)Residual (SI)
14.02246.89625.000000.002250.00225-6.7622e-10
25.01438.01400.000000.001440.001441.7769e-12
36.0998.62277.777789.9862e-049.9862e-041.9750e-09
47.0733.68204.081637.3368e-047.3368e-041.4765e-09
58.0561.72156.250005.6172e-045.6172e-04-2.5971e-09
69.0443.83123.456794.4383e-044.4383e-04-1.8000e-10

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

Separation distance r = 4.0 cm = 0.0400 m; inverse square 1/r² = 625.00 m⁻²; observed repulsive force F = 2246.89 μN = 2.246890e-03 N; sphere charges q₁ = q₂ = 20.0 nC = 2.00 × 10⁻⁸ C. Single-trial Coulomb constant estimate k_e = F · r² / q² = (2.246890e-03 × 0.001600) / (4.00 × 10⁻¹⁶) = 8.9876e+09 N m² C⁻². Linear regression of F against 1/r² across all six separation distances yields the reported slope and Coulomb constant.

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

0.0073.300.00223.770.00374.230.00524.690.00675.15Inverse square distance (1 / r²)Electrostatic force F

Dots show the sample observations. The line is the ordinary least-squares fit.

x̄ = 297.76103; ȳ = 0.00107
Σ(x − x̄)² = 177120.64998
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 0.63675
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 3.5950e-06
b = ȳ − mx̄ = -9.5992e-11
Slope S = 3.5950e-06 N m²; Sphere charge q = 20.0 nC; Coulomb constant k_e = S / q² = 8.9876e+09 N m² C⁻² (8.988 × 10⁹ N m² C⁻²); Intercept b = -9.5992e-11 N; Permittivity of free space ε₀ = 1 / (4π k_e) = 8.8542e-12 F m⁻¹ (8.854 pF m⁻¹)

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − model value| / |model value| × 100 = 0.0001%. Percentage difference is not experimental uncertainty.

For n = 5 observations, Σresidual² = 1.3315e-17; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 4.3352e-12. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 1.4903e-09.

Propagating only the relevant fit coefficient gives a fit-only standard error of 10837.96131 N m² C⁻². This is a one-standard-error quantity under the regression assumptions. Deterministic rounded model data do not supply a complete physical uncertainty budget.

Torsion fiber restoring constant calibration uncertainty (drifting shear stiffness ±0.5%), vernier separation scale parallax and non-coaxial sphere alignment (±0.2 mm in r, creating magnified ±0.8% error in 1/r²), parasitic atmospheric charge leakage via airborne ions and humidity (drift rate ~0.1 nC/min, minimized by desiccated silica chamber), electrostatic image charge induction between the conducting spheres and the grounded metal chamber shield, finite sphere radius correction (deviations from ideal point charges: Maxwell image series correction factor 1 − 4(a/r)³ ≈ 0.3% at closest approach r = 4 cm for a = 5 mm radius), and air convection currents inside the chamber contribute experimental uncertainty. Ordinary least-squares regression of F against 1/r² averages out random angular scale reading errors, with the slope isolating the true Coulomb product k_e q²

10. Result and discussion

8987550000.0 = 8.9876e+09 N m² C⁻²
Model comparison value: 8.9876e+09 N m² C⁻²

The observations follow the stated model relationship. Check whether the intercept and residual pattern suggest a systematic offset or a missing approximation. Agreement with the model does not independently verify its input constants.

11. Precautions and limitations

The analytical model treats the conducting spheres as mathematical point charges in an infinite, unbounded vacuum, neglecting electrostatic image charges induced in the chamber walls, minor finite-size multipole surface charge redistribution (Lord Kelvin image correction ~0.3% at r = 4 cm), and residual atmospheric ion leakage (~0.1 nC/min). In a physical laboratory, slight fiber mechanical hysteresis (zero drift after large twists), minute convective air currents inside the glass chamber, and environmental humidity fluctuations introduce small experimental scatter.

12. Conclusion

The worked example illustrates how to obtain Coulomb constant k_e from measurements, graph variables and a fitted coefficient. The estimate is 8.9876e+09 N m² C⁻². A real experiment must additionally evaluate the apparatus-specific uncertainties and corrections described above.