EXPERIMENT 46 · PHYSICS LABORATORY
Magnetic Moments: Gauss Deflection Magnetometer, Dipole Fields, and Tan-A Position
To investigate the magnetic dipole field generated by permanent bar magnets along the axial End-on (Tan-A) position of Gauss, verify the inverse-cube magnetic field distance dependence (B ∝ 1/d³), determine the magnetic dipole moment (M) and the ratio of moments using ordinary least-squares linear regression, and compare deflection and oscillation methods for geomagnetic metrology. Explore a virtual apparatus, collect readings and analyse a graph.
FOLLOW THE METHOD
A reason behind every step.
To investigate the magnetic dipole field generated by permanent bar magnets along the axial End-on (Tan-A) position of Gauss, verify the inverse-cube magnetic field distance dependence (B ∝ 1/d³), determine the magnetic dipole moment (M) and the ratio of moments using ordinary least-squares linear regression, and compare deflection and oscillation methods for geomagnetic metrology. Suggested independent settings: 14.0, 16.0, 18.0, 20.0, 22.0, 24.0 cm.
1Leveling and Magnetic Meridian Alignment
Place the deflection magnetometer on a rigid non-magnetic bench far from ferromagnetic fixtures or DC power leads. Using the brass leveling screws, level the instrument until the compass needle swings freely. Rotate the entire bench until the long aluminum pointer reads exactly 0°–0° while the arms of the bench extend precisely East and West.
Why this step matters
This alignment guarantees that the bar magnet's axial field along the bench is strictly perpendicular to Earth's horizontal geomagnetic field, satisfying the tangent law.
2Magnet Characterization and Pole Separation Measurement
Measure the physical length 2L and diameter of Magnet 1 using vernier calipers, and weigh it on an analytical balance. Calculate the effective magnetic length between pole centers using the standard empirical relation 2ℓ = 0.84 × 2L = 8.40 cm.
Why this step matters
Accurate physical dimensions are necessary to evaluate finite-length multipole corrections (d² − ℓ²) and compute moment of inertia.
3Direct Deflection Measurement on East Arm
Place Magnet 1 on the East arm carrier at distance d = 14.0 cm with its North pole facing inward toward the compass needle. Read both ends of the aluminum pointer (θ₁ and θ₂) using the anti-parallax mirror. Reverse the magnet on the carrier so its South pole faces inward, and record both ends (θ₃ and θ₄).
Why this step matters
Averaging both pointer ends cancels pivot eccentricity, while reversing magnet polarity cancels residual pointer bending offsets.
4Symmetric Arm Verification on West Arm
Transfer the magnet carrier to the West arm at the exact same distance d = 14.0 cm. Repeat the dual-polarity measurement sequence (North inward, then South inward), recording both pointer ends (θ₅, θ₆, θ₇, θ₈). Compute the grand mean deflection θ = (Σ θ_i) / 8.
Why this step matters
Testing both East and West arms cancels out any slight mechanical asymmetry in scale indexing or residual leveling tilt.
5Systematic Distance Series Acquisition
Repeat the complete eight-reading measurement sequence for six discrete distances (d = 14.0, 16.0, 18.0, 20.0, 22.0, and 24.0 cm). For each distance, compute the inverse-cube variable x = 1 / d³ (in m⁻³) and the dependent variable y = tan θ.
Why this step matters
Varying distance over the optimum angular window (20° to 61°) provides robust data for linear regression, confirming the inverse-cube dipole law.
6Secondary Magnet Comparison and Ratio Evaluation
Replace Magnet 1 with Magnet 2 and record deflections at identical distances. Compute the ratio of magnetic moments M₁ / M₂ = tan θ₁ / tan θ₂ to verify relative magnetization independent of Earth's field B_H.
Why this step matters
Comparing two magnets at identical distances isolates their moment ratio directly, canceling out the geomagnetic field B_H.